What kind of fallacy is the axe commercial

While you naturally want to draw a straight line between two events -- and that's how post hoc ergo propter hoc errors happen -- there are usually other factors at play.

Let's say, for example, that a local restaurant decides to revamp its menu, introducing a number of new items. After a couple weeks, sales skyrocket and the restaurant is more successful than ever. The new menu items must have caused this increase in business, right? What if, however, the restaurant also ran an aggressive advertising campaign to promote the new menu? Was it the new menu that generated more business or simply the increased visibility due to the ad campaign?

What if a competing restaurant closed down around the same time? Politicians, like most people, are apt to take credit when things go well, and they're quick to blame outside forces when things don't go so well. President Barack Obama has been credited for turning the economy around after the recession. After a couple of years of significant losses, Obama took office and GDP grew significantly. The post hoc approach would tell you that Obama caused this change.

Because he got elected, the country's economy improved Would the economy have bounced back if Republican John McCain were elected instead?

What about Hillary Clinton? There's no way to know. Logical fallacies, like post hoc ergo propter hoc, happen all the time. That's why it's important to be vigilant in identifying them, and in looking you may see that the results could otherwise be explained. AD HOMINEM Burger King is an example of Ad hominem because as we all know that burger are so delicious and sometimes we can feel that you want to eat more its look like a rebutted by attacking the character. Share this: Twitter Facebook.

Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Follow Following. Logical Fallacies in Advertisements. Sign me up.

Already have a WordPress. Log in now. In some ways, the growing awareness of concussions has created a new market for entrepreneurs to cash in on. The advantage of this is that there are some good products out there.

However, we are also witnessing a flooding in the market with pricey products that have no scientific evidence to back them up. You also have to be careful because of certain clinics that have been opened and staffed by so-called specialists who have no training or expertise on alleviating the symptoms of brain injury.

Buyers have to beware because everything from physical therapists to dermatologists to orthopedists have opened these unscrupulous clinics across the country.

The art of deception William D. Lutz is an American linguist who specialized in the use of plain language and the avoidance of doublespeak. Lots of these advertising claims for the products sound concrete, specific, and objective. However, William Lutz, in this topic points out that these attractive claims are weasel words, that is, these words meanings nothing but increased profits.

As a consequence, of the legal case between Mrs. Liebeck and the entire situation became a joke. A bias that I have developed so far in this class is that it made me cynical. I have developed this through readings in which people have used their discourse to manipulate others.

A big factor in this bias is the book Holy Terrors, in which Osama bin Laden and George Bush are using discourse to manipulate the people of their countries to join in their political agenda, even if they are in the wrong.

Bush telling the media that they could only broadcast certain clips of Osama, so that people would not feel as though he is just another leader trying to do good for his people.

Bush wanted us to feel like Osama was evil and this played a big role on my cynical views. The Onion article employs its usual gimmick of satire to highlight the absolute travesty that consumerism has done to the advertising world. This satire shows how consumerism has caused people to become sort of naive to the facets of advertising and in the process unknowingly suspend their well known beliefs and get sucked into the alluring trap of advertising.

It is very reminiscent of a formal proposal that provides a so proclaimed sensible solution, yet completely outrageous and abnormal in all regards. The satire benefits greatly in regards of the power of the satire from the continued profession and authoritative tone and formal proposal format which adds power to the argument of the satire.

Advertisements are everywhere, on television, radio, social media, billboards, magazines, and even on yearbooks. On the other hand, would it not be nice if every advertisement an individual saw, read, or heard were actually true? Like using Axe body spray really did attract women or eating Snickers truly made one satisfied in seconds? Yet, most of the time the advertisements that seem too good to be true, actually are.